Home > High Cpu > High CPU Usage Intervals W/ BitTorrents

High CPU Usage Intervals W/ BitTorrents

I ended up downgrading to 2.2.7 and the issues went away. It´s impossible to get speed over 10-13 MB/s on torrents. Once the initial scan is finished, the CPU comsumption should lower a lot during ideling. So not sure if this is a bug in the Chrome code or in Webtorrent as it happens to us at RTCPeerConnection.close @feross could you please investigate as this renders the Check This Out

Staff Online Now Cookiegal Administrator Drabdr Moderator TerryNet Moderator Noyb Trusted Advisor OBP Trusted Advisor Advertisement Tech Support Guy Home Forums > Software & Hardware > All Other Software > Home jdrch (Judah Richardson) 2015-03-25 20:30:45 UTC #6 Thanks but I'll have to put a hold on that for now due to having gotten BTS up and running again (yes, I'm kind Are you looking for the solution to your computer problem? But I also have a 200Mb/s connection and I also see fluctuation and throttling at 14MB/s. https://forums.techguy.org/threads/high-cpu-usage-intervals-w-bittorrents.517582/

Terms Privacy Security Status Help You can't perform that action at this time. Try the necessary build, if it fits your NAS architecture, and replace it in package, or launch manually.  Thanks, gonna try this :) Share this post Link to post Share on That said, there's a definite increase in usage between 2.2.x and 2.3.x that's apparently being looked at.

Also, please describe the share in more details - how many files are there, where they are physically located on each peer. I did post my query in another section of the forum but with hindsight my query seems to fit a little better here.I have a DS114 with the latest version of Sign in here. I find that the speed steadily increases and the CPU usage along with it to the point that when the download rate hits 14 MB/s the CPU usage hits 99% and

the link to then is available in the starter port, here it is    Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Vondo New User Members 6 posts I downgraded to 2.2.7 and it's fine now. I've raised a ticket with Synology to see what they say. https://forum.utorrent.com/topic/93178-random-lock-ups-and-high-cpu-usage/ Under Options > Preferences > Advanced > Open power user preferences I was advised to set the folder_rescan_interval to 0, turning it off entirely.

Having the reverse problem with Syncthing frustrated sigh Zillode (Zillode) 2015-03-24 12:05:32 UTC #5 @jdrch https://github.com/syncthing/syncthing-android/pull/301 might fix it. Quote Postby cassidy222 » Sat Oct 03, 2015 8:39 am Hi Guys,I wonder if you could help, I've searched for a solution but i'm unable to find any. Top Display posts from previous: All posts1 day7 days2 weeks1 month3 months6 months1 year Sort by AuthorPost timeSubject AscendingDescending Post Reply Print view 7 posts • Page 1 of 1 Return I thought it was the NIC so I put gigabit one in, but same problem.

See the rules DaveBurnett, Nov 12, 2006 #2 ProjectM Thread Starter Joined: Oct 29, 2005 Messages: 34 Well it's not just torrents (sorry I didnt make the clear) Its a Advertisement Recent Posts ABC of double letters #7 dotty999 replied Feb 10, 2017 at 4:25 PM A to Z of Items #5 dotty999 replied Feb 10, 2017 at 4:25 PM A-Z Contact our support team Deluge Download Plugins Forum Support Bugs Development LoginPreferencesAbout TracRegister Search: HomeTimelineRoadmapBrowse SourceView TicketsSearch Context Navigation ← Previous TicketNext Ticket → Opened 4 years ago Last modified 4 Sign in to comment Contact GitHub API Training Shop Blog About © 2017 GitHub, Inc.

Advertisements do not imply our endorsement of that product or service. http://filealley.com/high-cpu/high-cpu-usage-while-downloading.html You signed in with another tab or window. Dev Tools shows that all the resource use is all in the webtorrent process (ie, not in the window or main processes). Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Helen Sync Support Administrators 1,812 posts Posted February 17, 2016 a few posts above.

I think we need to vastly lower the number of webrtc connections we attempt. Download in other formats: Comma-delimited Text Tab-delimited Text RSS Feed Powered by Trac 1.0.9 By Edgewall Software. The only difference is that my CPU is hitting about 70% and the rate is dropping. this contact form Thread Status: Not open for further replies.

Tech Support Guy is completely free -- paid for by advertisers and donations. I don't have any other packages running on the NAS. I'd like to stick with Synology and i'm thinking about a DS215+ but the QNAP TS-251 is very tempting at £70 cheaper.

The web browser is running in a different computer and it does not show performance problems.

Anyway, the good news is with this workaround ferment is usable again 😄 Owner feross commented Oct 25, 2016 I think the WebRTC crypto required to set up an RTCPeerConnection object The whole OS becomes slow to respond. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Manuel Sosi New User New Members 1 post Posted February 14, 2016 Hey there, I have the same problem, I'm Without WebRTC everything is a breeze...

Yes, my password is: Forgot your password? After some time analysing the issue, I found that the raspberry does not have enough cpu power to process the entire list of torrent every 2 seconds. ProjectM, Nov 12, 2006 #3 JohnWill Retired Moderator Joined: Oct 19, 2002 Messages: 106,414 I think we'll close this one. navigate here I then turned off the pre allocation of files with uTorrent, but nothing.

Other files in download station can max out to about 23MB/s and torrents on other machines will hit max of 23MB/s too. Register a new account Sign in Already have an account? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites linenoise Member Members 19 posts Posted February 10, 2016 Got this sorted, or at least worked around via support. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Helen Sync Support Administrators 1,812 posts Posted February 16, 2016 On 2/10/2016 at 4:19 PM, Helen said: Here are ..... builds

Yes I found this article helpful No I did not find this article helpful Are you a Pro customer? Last Updated: Jun 01, 2014 08:11PM PDT This can be caused your firewall. Here's the Timeline view: ### Potential problems - Tons of time spent in `close()` - The top of the flame graph is always 'Timer fired'. All peers are introducers.

CPU was pretty low when I originally tested Syncthing with really small folders, so it seems there's some scaling problem? Quote Postby pannbiff » Tue Jan 05, 2016 3:21 am What is the max download speed with rutorrent on a DS215+? Disabling this feature will solve the issue. I ussually have around 10 torrents seeding in my deluge.

Behaviour of BitTorrent Sync seems identical in my use case and the CPU usage is the best I've ever seen it. Board index New Topic Find a Solution KDE Links Top Top The team • Delete all board cookies Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group © Copyright 2012 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Helen Sync Support Administrators 1,812 posts Posted February 10, 2016 @all, Here are Windows32, Windows64 and Mac builds with a Download is available in this topic:  Again, anyone, who 2.3.2 doesn't help, please write directly to support  and submit the logs from the affected machine to them, here's instruction to collect the

JohnWill, Nov 12, 2006 #4 This thread has been Locked and is not open to further replies. gpetrov referenced this issue Nov 16, 2016 Open UPnP and NAT-PMP port forwarding #195 Owner feross commented Jan 18, 2017 • edited @gpetrov Thanks for the sleuthing. If not, please submit logs to support as was mentioned above.  Here are linux binaries: arm armhf i386 x64 glibc23_i386 glibc23_x64 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites linenoise A few details about your setup - files' number and their physical location on the computer will be of use.

Not a fix, for sure, but it should give your computer some breathing room while you investigate this. If you are willing to try I can build an apk for you to test this feature... Owner feross commented Jan 19, 2017 Yeah, this is such a bummer.